New Zealand will increase the International Visitor Conservation and Tourism Levy (IVL) from N$35 to N$100 from October 1, 2024.
Visitors to New Zealand pay N$100 when they apply for the NZeTA, which is currently valid for two years: Australians, many Pacific Island Nationals, and those with APEC cards are excluded.
You can access New Zealand’s page for NZeTA here.
Who is excluded?
- travel to New Zealand on:
- an Australian or New Zealand passport
- a passport from many Pacific Island nations
- are a transit passenger arriving at and leaving from Auckland International Airport
- have a New Zealand resident visa
- hold an Australian Resident Visa
- hold a Business Visitor Visa or APEC business travel card.
NZ Government Release about this fee:
IVL increase to ensure visitors contribute more to New Zealand
The International Visitor Conservation and Tourism Levy (IVL) will be raised to $100 to ensure visitors contribute to public services and high-quality experiences while visiting New Zealand, Minister for Tourism and Hospitality Matt Doocey and Minister of Conservation Tama Potaka say.
“The Government is serious about enabling the tourism sector to grow as part of our overall goal of doubling exports in 10 years. International tourism plays a hugely important role in the New Zealand economy, with international visitors spending over $11 billion in the year ending March 2024,” Mr Doocey says.
“But international tourism also comes with costs to local communities, including additional pressure on regional infrastructure and higher upkeep and maintenance costs across our conservation estate.
“The IVL was introduced in 2019 as a mechanism to ensure international visitors were contributing directly to these costs, the vast majority of which are paid for by New Zealand taxpayers and ratepayers.”
“Public consultation by the Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment (MBIE) found 93 per cent of submitters supported raising the IVL, with the main rationale being an increase would be reasonable to help cover the costs of tourism.
“The new IVL remains competitive with countries like Australia and the UK, and we are confident New Zealand will continue to be seen as an attractive visitor destination by many around the world.
“A $100 IVL would generally make up less than 3 per cent of the total spending for an international visitor while in New Zealand, meaning it is unlikely to have a significant impact on visitor numbers.
“Increasing the IVL means we can continue to grow international tourism to support economic growth while ensuring international visitors contribute to high-value conservation areas and projects, such as supporting biodiversity in national parks and other highly visited areas and improving visitor experiences on public conservation land,” Mr Doocey says.
“Taxpayers already contribute close to $884 million a year directly on tourism and conservation, including tourism promotion, natural heritage and recreation. This money funds Tourism New Zealand, protects biodiversity within the Department of Conservation estate and provides quality experiences at the likes of Milford Sound, Aoraki/Mt Cook and the Tongariro Alpine Crossing,” Mr Potaka says.
Proposals for government investment to support tourism growth and conservation will be considered in due course.
Notes to editor:
- MBIE received a total of 1,101 submissions on the proposed changes to the IVL, this included 1,011 responses via the online survey and 90 responses via email.
- A summary of submissions from the IVL consultation is available on the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment’s website: mbie.govt.nz/IVL-increase
- Visitors that are exempt from the requirement to pay the IVL include New Zealand and Australian citizens and permanent residents, diplomats and people from many Pacific Island countries.
- The change in the IVL takes place from October 1.
Conclusion
I absolutely loathe “tourism” taxes that various countries and municipalities charge, but they are usually baked in the airfares or hotel rates as “taxes” and we don’t necessarily even realize that we pay them.
If you look at who is exempt from paying these, they must represent 80% to 90% of international visitors to New Zealand, considering the country’s remote location.
I doubt that this fee will negatively impact tourism numbers, as the country is already an expensive destination, both airfare and accommodation-wise, although lovely.
I tend to visit New Zealand once a year or every other year as part of a greater Pacific itinerary, like I did this February when I flew to Auckland from Papeete, then continued to Australia and then to Bali.
Source
